UK Casino Operators Highlight Risks from Proposed Machine Games Duty Increase
Written by Tina Bauer · Oct 17, 2026

UK Casino Operators Highlight Risks from Proposed Machine Games Duty Increase

Leading UK casino operators have issued warnings about a proposed doubling of Machine Games Duty from 20% to 40%, a move that could feature in the autumn budget scheduled for October 2026, and they point to potential impacts on investment, staffing, and venue operations across the land-based sector.
Details of the Tax Proposal
The increase would apply to Machine Games Duty, which covers gaming machines in casinos and other venues, and industry representatives note that this change arrives at a time when operators have begun to see benefits from recent Gambling Commission reforms that permit more slot machines per casino location, reforms introduced to support modernisation and growth in the land-based market.
Statements from Genting Casinos Leadership
Genting Casinos COO Paul Willcock has joined other operators in emphasising that the proposed duty hike threatens to halt planned investments, reduce staffing levels, and place both jobs and the viability of individual venues at risk, while the sector continues to adjust to the updated machine allowances granted through the Gambling Commission updates.
Industry Calls for Tax Certainty
These warnings have emerged alongside broader industry requests for greater tax certainty, which operators argue would better support ongoing modernisation efforts and long-term growth plans, particularly as the autumn budget approaches in October 2026 and decisions on duty rates remain under consideration.
Observers note that the timing coincides with positive developments from the Gambling Commission land-based modernisation programme, including expanded machine numbers that have allowed venues to refresh offerings and attract more visitors, yet the potential duty change introduces uncertainty that could offset those gains.

Potential Effects on Operations and Employment
Operators have outlined how a jump from 20% to 40% in Machine Games Duty would directly affect cash flow, making it harder to maintain current staffing structures or proceed with venue upgrades and expansions that had been anticipated following the recent regulatory adjustments, and they stress that venue viability could come under pressure in multiple regions.
Data from sector reports referenced in the discussions show that many casinos rely on machine revenue as a core component of their business model, so an increase of this magnitude would require significant operational adjustments, including possible reductions in employee numbers and delays to investment projects already in planning stages.
Context Around the Autumn Budget Timeline
With the autumn budget set for October 2026, industry groups have stepped up their communications to policymakers, highlighting the need for stable tax treatment that aligns with the Gambling Commission reforms already in place and allows operators to plan for growth rather than face abrupt cost increases that could reverse recent progress.
Those familiar with the sector point out that the proposed duty change has been discussed in relation to earlier thinktank reports from several months prior, which examined gaming taxation options and prompted the current round of industry responses focused on maintaining investment levels and protecting employment across casino venues.
Broader Sector Implications
The combined effect of the duty proposal and the existing modernisation measures creates a mixed outlook for land-based casinos, where expanded machine permissions offer new revenue opportunities at the same time that higher taxation could limit the ability to capitalise on those changes through sustained staffing and capital expenditure.
Conclusion
UK casino operators, including Genting Casinos through its COO Paul Willcock, continue to communicate the potential consequences of the Machine Games Duty increase to 40%, framing their concerns around investment pauses, staffing reductions, and venue risks while acknowledging the positive steps taken through Gambling Commission reforms, and they maintain that tax certainty remains essential ahead of the October 2026 autumn budget decisions.